Remote Viewing & PSI: Espionage Psyop or Intuitive Superpower?
Discover the truth about Remote Viewing and PSI. Once shunned as clairvoyance, now framed as science by the CIA. Is it real, a useful tool, or just creative visualization? Find out...
🚨 What is Remote Viewing?
Remote Viewing (RV) is the practice of "seeing" distant places, people, or objects without physically being there. Closely related to PSI (a catch-all term for psychic phenomena like telepathy and precognition), Remote Viewing emerged as a rebrand of clairvoyance — a fresh coat of science-flavoured paint for an ancient human capacity.
Before the term “remote viewing” existed, it was simply called second sight, or clairvoyance. But when the Stanford Research Institute (SRI), backed by millions in CIA funding, got involved in the 1970s, they couldn’t very well label it “mystical vision.” So a new term was coined — Remote Viewing — designed to sound clinical, credible, and clean of any “crystal ball” connotations.
The move distanced their research from the patchouli-scented realms of spiritualism. After all, intelligence agencies don’t want to be seen employing kooks.
🧠 How is Remote Viewing Done?
Remote Viewing typically involves sitting quietly, entering a meditative or semi-trance state, and using structured protocols to focus on a specific “target” – usually defined only by a set of coordinates, a number, or a vague cue. Techniques vary, but popular methods include:
CRV (Coordinate Remote Viewing): Developed by Ingo Swann and used by the military; it’s a step-by-step approach involving sketching and data collection.
ERV (Extended Remote Viewing): A looser method, akin to a deep meditative state or lucid dreaming, where impressions are recorded without structure.
ARV (Associative Remote Viewing): Used to make binary predictions (e.g., yes/no outcomes) by associating potential futures with visual symbols.
The common denominator in all methods? Mental stillness and focused internal imagery. That’s it.
👁️🗨️ Does It Actually Work?
According to physicist Russell Targ and laser specialist Hal Puthoff, yes—it does. They claim their experiments demonstrated statistically significant results, proving the mind can perceive beyond space and time. Former military viewers like Joseph McMoneagle and David Morehouse argue Remote Viewing works—but not because of some paranormal force. They say it's about clear visualization and stopping the internal noise. In essence, meditation meets imagination.
They also suggest anyone can learn it, though the training regimes they outline may seem daunting. That in itself might create a gatekeeping effect — implying this is a “rare” skill requiring elite schooling. But in truth, it may be as simple as this:
Stop your inner chatter. Focus your intent. See what comes.
🧘 Is It All Just Visualization?
Here’s my take: Forget proof. Try it yourself.
Sure, you can bury yourself in statistical data and military documents, or you can start using Remote Viewing creatively right now. Suspend belief during the act, remain skeptical afterwards. Analyze it.
Will you truly “see” the actual location or person? Maybe. Maybe not. But that’s not the point. Use it as a creative tool for insight and orientation. Like divination, it can sharpen your senses, align your focus, and prime your mind for what’s to come.
Say you’ve got a job interview at a corporate office. Try Remote Viewing the building beforehand. Even if you don’t see the exact layout, you’ll likely feel more acclimated when you walk in. Your brain won’t treat it as unfamiliar. That alone reduces nerves and improves performance.
🧩 Psyop, Mind Hack, or Both?
Could the entire Remote Viewing craze have been a psychological operation?
Consider this: by publicizing their experiments, did the CIA aim to scare rivals — planting the idea that they had psychic operatives who could peer into enemy secrets from afar? That’s classic reality engineering. A kind of “Harry Potter meets Langley” scenario. Foreign adversaries might think twice before plotting something sensitive.
On the domestic front, it’s not a bad thing for the population to believe they’re being watched — not only by surveillance cameras but also by unseen eyes in the ether. A deterrent, without the cost of hardware.
🪐 ETs, Alien Bases & Fairy Dust
Remote Viewers have claimed to “see” ancient structures on Mars, alien bases under the sea, and communicate with extraterrestrial intelligences. Interesting? Yes. Provable? Not so much.
In fact, this could all be a convenient distraction — redirecting attention away from cutting-edge military tech. Every time the public gets too close to asking tough questions, a new wave of ET-based Remote Viewing “intel” emerges. Coincidence?
The UAP world is rich in mystique, but always thin on material proof — just like fairy lore of old.
🧬 Nano-Speed Thinking?
It might all boil down to this: Cold reasoning mixed with focused visualization. Perhaps what we call “remote viewing” is really just intuitive pattern recognition — a kind of nano-speed subconscious thinking that outpaces our conscious mind.
We feel we’ve “seen” something. But really, it’s the sum total of our unconscious computations giving us a picture before reason catches up.
And that’s no small thing. It means the mind has deeper faculties than we’re taught. And those faculties can be trained.
📣 Your Turn
Have you tried Remote Viewing or other PSI practices?
Do you think the CIA was weaponizing intuition — or just chasing shadows?
👇 Comment below and let’s hear your thoughts.
🔁 Share this post with those exploring the edges of mind and perception.